Cyrus v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP
This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 3043 (Cyrus v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Cyrus v Wal-Mart Stores E., LP |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 03043 |
| Decided on April 27, 2018 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on April 27, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
588 CA 17-01120
v
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
POWERS & SANTOLA, LLP, ALBANY (MICHAEL J. HUTTER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
BROWN HUTCHINSON LLP, ROCHESTER (T. ANDREW BROWN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William K. Taylor, J.), entered February 24, 2017. The judgment awarded defendant costs and disbursements upon a jury verdict finding no liability.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries that were sustained by plaintiff Lizzie Cyrus when she slipped and fell in one of defendant's stores. On appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant, plaintiffs correctly concede that they failed to preserve for our review their contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence inasmuch as "there is no indication in the record that [they] made a posttrial motion to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a)" (Likos v Niagara Frontier Tr. Metro Sys., Inc., 149 AD3d 1474, 1476 [4th Dept 2017]). We decline plaintiffs' request to exercise our power to address that contention in the interest of justice (see generally Merrill v Albany Med. Ctr. Hosp., 71 NY2d 990, 991 [1988]).
Entered: April 27, 2018
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 NY Slip Op 3043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cyrus-v-wal-mart-stores-e-lp-nyappdiv-2018.