Cyrus E. Peck, William L. Paul, Fred Harris, Eugene Johnson and Mike Prokof v. United States
This text of 219 F.2d 445 (Cyrus E. Peck, William L. Paul, Fred Harris, Eugene Johnson and Mike Prokof v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
219 F.2d 445
Cyrus E. PECK, William L. Paul, Fred Harris, Eugene Johnson and Mike Prokof, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 13847.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
February 23, 1955.
Appeal from the District Court for the Territory of Alaska, Division No. One; George W. Folta, Judge.
William L. Paul, Jr., Juneau, Alaska, L. Frederick Paul, Seattle, Wash., for appellants.
T. E. Munson, U. S. Atty., Juneau, Alaska, for appellee.
Before MATHEWS, HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, United States v. Peck, D.C.Alaska, 108 F.Supp. 625, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 F.2d 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cyrus-e-peck-william-l-paul-fred-harris-eugene-johnson-and-mike-prokof-ca9-1955.