Cyrus Brook Estates, Inc. v. Village of Irvington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cyrus Brook Estates, Inc. v. Village of Irvington

58 A.D.2d 589, 395 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12631

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.2d 589 (Cyrus Brook Estates, Inc. v. Village of Irvington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cyrus Brook Estates, Inc. v. Village of Irvington, 58 A.D.2d 589, 395 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to declare the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the Village of Irvington to be unreasonable, illegal, unconstitutional and void insofar as it relates to the plaintiff’s real property, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered November 30, 1976, as (1) dismissed its first, second and fourth affirmative defenses and (2) struck its third affirmative defense, with leave to replead. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Special Term’s determination is amply supported by the [590]*590record on this appeal. Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to declare the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map of the Village of Irvington to be unreasonable, illegal, unconstitutional and void insofar as it relates to the plaintiff’s real property, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered November 30, 1976, as (1) dismissed its first, second and fourth affirmative defenses and (2) struck its third affirmative defense, with leave to replead. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Special Term’s determination is amply supported by the [590]*590record on this appeal. Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 589, 395 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cyrus-brook-estates-inc-v-village-of-irvington-nyappdiv-1977.