Cyrill Pokladnik and Wife, Justine Pokladnik v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Cyrill Pokladnik and Wife, Justine Pokladnik v. United States

378 F.2d 59, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6138

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 1967

Docket23501_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 378 F.2d 59 (Cyrill Pokladnik and Wife, Justine Pokladnik v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cyrill Pokladnik and Wife, Justine Pokladnik v. United States, 378 F.2d 59, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6138 (5th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The United States condemned 296 acres of a 383 acre tract owned by appellants to be used as a reservoir and for recreational purposes.

On this appeal the Pokladnik’s principal contention is that the increase in value of a portion of the remainder of their tract was not a special and direct benefit to the tract and should not have been deducted from their compensation or, in the alternative, if the increase m value was a special and direct benefit it was too speculative to legitimately be taken into account.

This contention has been effectively foreclosed by United States v. 2,477.79 Acres of Land, etc., in Bell County, 5 Cir., 1958, 259 F.2d 23, where this Court considered an almost identical contention.

We have considered the other contentions of appellants and find them to be without merit.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI