Cyril v. Neighborhood Partnership Housing Fund, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cyril v. Neighborhood Partnership Housing Fund, Inc.

309 A.D.2d 828, 766 N.Y.S.2d 66, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10782

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 309 A.D.2d 828 (Cyril v. Neighborhood Partnership Housing Fund, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cyril v. Neighborhood Partnership Housing Fund, Inc., 309 A.D.2d 828, 766 N.Y.S.2d 66, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover for damage to property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated April 1, 2002, which, inter alia, denied his motion for a preliminary injunction.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.

[829]*829The plaintiffs appeal has been rendered academic as a result of the affirmance by the Appellate Term, Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, of the judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, awarding possession of the premises in question to the owner (see Neighborhood Partnership Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v Okolie, 2003 NY Slip Op 50707[U]). In any event, the plaintiff failed to show that he was entitled to a preliminary injunction (see Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso, 75 NY2d 860, 862 [1990]; Somers Stained Glass Corp. v Somers Designs, 277 AD2d 442, 443 [2000]). Ritter, J.P., Florio, S. Miller and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover for damage to property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated April 1, 2002, which, inter alia, denied his motion for a preliminary injunction.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.

[829]*829The plaintiffs appeal has been rendered academic as a result of the affirmance by the Appellate Term, Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, of the judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, awarding possession of the premises in question to the owner (see Neighborhood Partnership Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. v Okolie, 2003 NY Slip Op 50707[U]). In any event, the plaintiff failed to show that he was entitled to a preliminary injunction (see Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso, 75 NY2d 860, 862 [1990]; Somers Stained Glass Corp. v Somers Designs, 277 AD2d 442, 443 [2000]). Ritter, J.P., Florio, S. Miller and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 A.D.2d 828, 766 N.Y.S.2d 66, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cyril-v-neighborhood-partnership-housing-fund-inc-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack