Cyr v. Reliance Standard
This text of Cyr v. Reliance Standard (Cyr v. Reliance Standard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LAURA A. CYR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 07-56869 RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE D.C. No. INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois CV-06-01585-DDP corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
LAURA A. CYR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Defendant-Appellant, No. 08-55234 and CHANNEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. D.C. No. CV-06-01585-DDP GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY ORDER INSURANCE PROGRAM, an employee benefit plan; CHANNEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., in its capacity as Administrator of the Channel Technologies, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Program, Defendants. Filed December 2, 2010
19639 19640 CYR v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INS. ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Judge Pregerson did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2010 Thomson Reuters/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cyr v. Reliance Standard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cyr-v-reliance-standard-ca9-2010.