CYPRESS FOUNTAIN BEACH, INC. v. Chacon

33 So. 3d 825, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5974, 2010 WL 1726255
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 2010·No. 5D09-4209·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for writ of certio-rari, concluding that the trial court’s denial of petitioners’ discovery request did not constitute a material departure from the essential requirements of law that could not be remedied on plenary appeal. Palmer v. WDI Sys., Inc., 588 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Our denial is without prejudice to petitioners’ right to examine Ms. Herman, under oath, at a hearing on their motion to vacate partial final judgment and/or at a hearing on attorney’s *826 fees. Furthermore, our denial is without prejudice to petitioners’ right to serve a subpoena duces tecum on Ms. Herman requiring her to produce relevant, non-privileged documents at the above-referenced hearings.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED.

PALMER, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CYPRESS FOUNTAIN BEACH, INC. v. Chacon, 33 So. 3d 825, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 5974, 2010 WL 1726255 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

33 So. 3d 825 (CYPRESS FOUNTAIN BEACH, INC. v. Chacon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palmer v. WDI Systems, Inc.
588 So. 2d 1087 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)