Cynthia Vanpelt and Curtis Lusk v. Ismael Castaneda and Maria Castaneda

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 11, 2011·No. 02-11-00235-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00235-CV

CYNTHIA VANPELT AND CURTIS APPELLANTS LUSK

V.

ISMAEL CASTANEDA AND MARIA APPELLEES CASTANEDA

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On June 29, 2011, and July 13, 2011, we notified appellants, in

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this

appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Appellants have not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellants have failed to comply with a requirement of the rules

of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28,

2007,2 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 11, 2011

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in courts of appeals).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cynthia Vanpelt and Curtis Lusk v. Ismael Castaneda and Maria Castaneda, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Cynthia Vanpelt and Curtis Lusk v. Ismael Castaneda and Maria Castaneda (Cynthia Vanpelt and Curtis Lusk v. Ismael Castaneda and Maria Castaneda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.