Cynthia Jiles v. Eric Shinseki
This text of 391 F. App'x 574 (Cynthia Jiles v. Eric Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cynthia Jiles appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of her employment-discrimination action. Upon de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that the complaint failed to state a claim, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950-52, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (assuming veracity of well-pleaded factual allegations, court should determine whether they plausibly give rise to entitlement to relief). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
391 F. App'x 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cynthia-jiles-v-eric-shinseki-ca8-2010.