Cynthia Jiles v. Eric Shinseki

391 F. App'x 574
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2010·No. 10-2212·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia Jiles appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of her employment-discrimination action. Upon de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that the complaint failed to state a claim, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950-52, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (assuming veracity of well-pleaded factual allegations, court should determine whether they plausibly give rise to entitlement to relief). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cynthia Jiles v. Eric Shinseki, 391 F. App'x 574 (8th Cir. 2010).

391 F. App'x 574 (Cynthia Jiles v. Eric Shinseki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jiles v. Shinseki
178 L. Ed. 2d 554 (Supreme Court, 2010)