Cynthia D. Fox v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart

52 F. App'x 312
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 6, 2002
Docket02-1872
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 F. App'x 312 (Cynthia D. Fox v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cynthia D. Fox v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 52 F. App'x 312 (8th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia Fox appeals the district court’s 1 decision affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits. Fox withdraws her argument that the Commissioner’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence, and argues for reversal only that the administrative law judge (ALJ) committed legal error by failing to mention certain medical professionals and their diagnoses. Having carefully reviewed the record, it is apparent to us that any deficiency in opinion-writing by the ALJ in this case had no practical effect on the outcome and does not constitute a sufficient reason for setting aside the administrative decision. See Senne v. Apfel, 198 F.3d 1065, 1067 (8th Cir.1999). Ac *313 eordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Volmert v. Colvin
E.D. Missouri, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 F. App'x 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cynthia-d-fox-v-jo-anne-b-barnhart-ca8-2002.