Cynthia Cannon v. Georgia Department of Labor
This text of Cynthia Cannon v. Georgia Department of Labor (Cynthia Cannon v. Georgia Department of Labor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 25-11281 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 10/09/2025 Page: 1 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-11281 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
CYNTHIA ANTONIA CANNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:24-cv-04449-TCB ____________________
Before BRANCH, LAGOA, and KIDD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. USCA11 Case: 25-11281 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 10/09/2025 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 25-11281
By statute, Cynthia Cannon had 30 days to file a notice of appeal from the district court’s November 20, 2024, final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Her deadline for doing so was December 20, 2024. However, Cannon did not file a notice of appeal until April 10, 2025. Further, the record contains no basis for relief under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) (providing that a party may move to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal within 30 days of entry of final judgment); id. R. 4(a)(6)(A) (providing that the court may reopen the time to file an appeal for a period of 14 days where a party does not receive notice of the entry of the judgment). Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules. Cannon’s pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cynthia Cannon v. Georgia Department of Labor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cynthia-cannon-v-georgia-department-of-labor-ca11-2025.