Cynthia Ann Bridges v. State

Texas Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 2017·No. 11-17-00154-CR·Published

Opinion

FILED FOR RECO Dv

. TEP :ENS CO UHTY. TEJ\AS

ZU\1 JUN l 3 A q: 02

FILED IN

11th COURT OF APPEALS

CHRISTIE COAPLANO EASTLAND, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. F35098 DIST RI CT CLERI{ 06/13/17 11:00:24 AM

gyjf~ SHERRY OEPUTY WILLIAMSON Clerk

THE STATE OF TEXAS * IN THE 90TH DISTRICT

vs. * COURT OF

CYNTHIA ANN BRIDGES * STEPHENS COUNTY, TEXAS

ORDER APPOINTING ATTORNEY

Pursuant to application for court appointed appellate counsel for indigent defendant heretofore presented to the Court, and after having given the same due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that an attorney should be appointed to represent the defendant in the above entitled and numbered cause.

It is ordered that Tim Copeland, a practicing and qualified attorney of this bar be, and said attorney is hereby appointed as appellate attorney for the defendant in the above entitled and numbered cause. This appointment is effective the date of this order, or such earlier date as actual notice of such appointment may have been given to said attorney, if the same appears anywhere in the record of this cause.

Signed this 9th day of June, 2017.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cynthia Ann Bridges v. State, (Tex. 2017).

Cynthia Ann Bridges v. State (Cynthia Ann Bridges v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.