Cynthia Andrews v. Mary Brock A/K/A Cindy Brock

Court of Appeals of Texas

Cynthia Andrews v. Mary Brock A/K/A Cindy Brock

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 11, 2016·No. 02-15-00117-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00117-CV

CYNTHIA ANDREWS APPELLANT V.

MARY BROCK A/K/A CINDY APPELLEE BROCK

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-006760-1

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On January 5, 2016, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and SUDDERTH, JJ. DELIVERED: February 11, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00117-CV

CYNTHIA ANDREWS APPELLANT V.

MARY BROCK A/K/A CINDY APPELLEE BROCK

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2014-006760-1

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On January 5, 2016, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and SUDDERTH, JJ. DELIVERED: February 11, 2016

Cynthia Andrews v. Mary Brock A/K/A Cindy Brock, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Cynthia Andrews v. Mary Brock A/K/A Cindy Brock (Cynthia Andrews v. Mary Brock A/K/A Cindy Brock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.