CYNOSURE, LLC AND LOTUS PARENT, INC. v. KRISTOPHER HUSTON AND BTL INDUSTRIES, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

CYNOSURE, LLC AND LOTUS PARENT, INC. v. KRISTOPHER HUSTON AND BTL INDUSTRIES, INC.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 24, 2021

Docket21-0050

StatusPublished

This text of CYNOSURE, LLC AND LOTUS PARENT, INC. v. KRISTOPHER HUSTON AND BTL INDUSTRIES, INC. (CYNOSURE, LLC AND LOTUS PARENT, INC. v. KRISTOPHER HUSTON AND BTL INDUSTRIES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CYNOSURE, LLC AND LOTUS PARENT, INC. v. KRISTOPHER HUSTON AND BTL INDUSTRIES, INC., (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

CYNOSURE, LLC, and LOTUS PARENT, INC.,

Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

v.

KRISTOPHER HUSTON and BTL INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

No. 2D21-50

September 24, 2021

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Steven Scott Stephens, Judge.

Courtney B. Wilson of Littler Mendelson, P.C., Miami, for Appellants.

Barbara Viota-Sawisch, Beverly A. Pohl, and Scott D. Knapp of Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel, Fort Lauderdale; and Bret A. Cohen and Jillian Hart of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, C.J., and KELLY and SMITH, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI