Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Cyllene Corp. v. Eisen

Cyllene Corp. v. Eisen

248 A.D. 696
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

The motion is premature, no order having been settled and entered upon the determination of the appeal. When that is done the motion for reargument or leave to appeal will be considered. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Glennon and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cyllene Corp. v. Eisen, 248 A.D. 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 696 (Cyllene Corp. v. Eisen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.