Cyganiewicz v. Cyganiewicz
This text of 237 A.D. 902 (Cyganiewicz v. Cyganiewicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order framing issues for jury trial upon condition reversed on. thq law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, with leave to defendant to renew upon plaintiff moving the case for trial. In our opinion, the motion is premature. Plaintiff is not obliged to proceed to trial until and unless defendant complies with the order granting alimony and counsel fee pendente lite. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D. 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cyganiewicz-v-cyganiewicz-nyappdiv-1933.