Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants/cross-Appellants

122 F.3d 46, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23546
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 5, 1997·No. 96-1286·Published

Opinion

122 F.3d 46

CYBOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants/Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 96-1286, 96-1287.

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

Sept. 5, 1997.

Appealed from: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California; Judge Whyte.

Tod L. Gamlen, Baker & McKenzie, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. With him on brief was David I. Roche, of Chicago, IL.

Douglas A. Cawley, Hughes & Luce, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Defendants/Cross-Appellants. Of counsel was Aubrey Nick Pittman.

ORDER

The appeals, having been heard by a panel of the court and, thereafter, a majority of the circuit judges who are in regular active service having acted sua sponte in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 46(c) and Fed. R.App. P. 35(a),

IT IS ORDERED that the appeals shall be decided in banc. Additional briefing and argument will not be required.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants/cross-Appellants, 122 F.3d 46, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23546 (Fed. Cir. 1997).

122 F.3d 46 (Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants/cross-Appellants) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cybor Corp. v. Fas Technologies, Inc.
122 F.3d 46 (Federal Circuit, 1997)