Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants/cross-Appellants
This text of 122 F.3d 46 (Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants/cross-Appellants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CYBOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants/Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 96-1286, 96-1287.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Sept. 5, 1997.
Appealed from: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California; Judge Whyte.
Tod L. Gamlen, Baker & McKenzie, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. With him on brief was David I. Roche, of Chicago, IL.
Douglas A. Cawley, Hughes & Luce, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Defendants/Cross-Appellants. Of counsel was Aubrey Nick Pittman.
ORDER
The appeals, having been heard by a panel of the court and, thereafter, a majority of the circuit judges who are in regular active service having acted sua sponte in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 46(c) and Fed. R.App. P. 35(a),
IT IS ORDERED that the appeals shall be decided in banc. Additional briefing and argument will not be required.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 F.3d 46, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cybor-corporation-v-fas-technologies-inc-and-fasta-cafc-1997.