C.Y. v. R.H.

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedMay 12, 2025
DocketSCWC-24-0000097
StatusPublished

This text of C.Y. v. R.H. (C.Y. v. R.H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C.Y. v. R.H., (haw 2025).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 12-MAY-2025 12:08 PM Dkt. 3 ODSAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

C.Y., Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

R.H., Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE. NO. 1FPA-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate

Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of

certiorari was filed, see Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 602-59(a)

(2017); see also Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP)

Rule 36(b)(1) (2016),

It is ordered that Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant’s

application for writ of certiorari, filed May 9, 2025, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application

pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2023) (“The application shall be

filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate

court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless

the time for filing the application is extended in accordance

with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 12, 2025.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
C.Y. v. R.H., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cy-v-rh-haw-2025.