Cwikla v. Westinghouse Electric Co.
122 A.D.2d 596, 505 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59878
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
— Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff lost his right to appeal by the acceptance of the sum of $200 awarded under the conditional order (see, Dolin v Passero-Scardetta Assoc., 110 AD2d 1051). If we were to reach the merits, we would affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision at Special Term (Swartwood, J.). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Swartwood, J. — vacate default.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cwikla v. Westinghouse Electric Co., 122 A.D.2d 596, 505 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
122 A.D.2d 596 (Cwikla v. Westinghouse Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. Woodstone Custom Homes, Inc.
198 A.D.2d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)