CWCapital Cobalt VR Ltd. v. CWCaptial Invs. LLC

2024 NY Slip Op 34515(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedDecember 24, 2024
DocketIndex No. 653277/2018
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 34515(U) (CWCapital Cobalt VR Ltd. v. CWCaptial Invs. LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CWCapital Cobalt VR Ltd. v. CWCaptial Invs. LLC, 2024 NY Slip Op 34515(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

CWCapital Cobalt VR Ltd. v CWCaptial Invs. LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 34515(U) December 24, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 653277/2018 Judge: Andrea Masley Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 653277/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1605 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/24/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION PART 48 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X CWCAPITAL COBALT VR LTD., INDEX NO. 653277/2018

Plaintiff, MOTION DATE - -v- MOTION SEQ. NO. 037 038 CWCAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC and CWCAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, DECISION + ORDER ON Defendants. MOTION -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

HON. ANDREA MASLEY:

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 037) 1565, 1566, 1567, 1568, 1569, 1570, 1588, 1589 were read on this motion to/for SEAL .

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 038) 1571, 1572, 1573, 1574, 1575, 1576, 1577, 1587, 1590 were read on this motion to/for SEAL .

In motion sequence number 037, nonparty Sculptor Capital Management, Inc.

(Sculptor) moves pursuant to the Uniform Rules of the New York State Trial Courts (22

NYCRR) § 216.1 to redact the following documents:

1. Blair Wallace’s affirmation (NYCSEF Doc. No. [NYSCEF] 914, 1111, 1569)1

2. Matthew Tuten’s affirmation (NYSCEF 942, 1110, 1569)2

3. CWCapital memorandum of law (NYSCEF 1117, 1569)3

4. CWCapital opposition (NYSCEF 1222, 1569)4

1 A publicly redacted copy is filed at NYSCEF 1570. 2 A publicly redacted copy is filed at NYSCEF 1570. 3 A publicly redacted copy is filed at NYSCEF 1570.

4 A publicly redacted copy is filed at NYSCEF 1570.

653277/2018 CWCAPITAL COBALT VR LTD. vs. CWCAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC Page 1 of 6 Motion No. 037 038

1 of 6 [* 1] INDEX NO. 653277/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1605 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/24/2024

5. CWCapital reply (NYSCEF 1230, 1569)5

The motion is unopposed. There is no indication that the press or public have an

interest in this matter.

In motion sequence number 038, nonparty Midland Loan Services, a Division of

PNC Bank, NA (PNC Bank) moves pursuant to the Uniform Rules of the New York

State Trial Courts (22 NYCRR) § 216.1 to seal and/or redact the following documents:

1. Amendment to Letter Agreement, dated July 9, 2014 (NYSCEF 1271,

1573)

2. Letter Agreement dated Feb. 11, 2011 (NYSCEF 1287, 1573)

3. Letter Agreement dated Apr. 1, 2014 (NYSCEF 1288, 1573)

4. Letter Agreement dated Jul. 9, 2014 (NYSCEF 1289, 1573)

5. CWCapital Cobalt memorandum of law to supplement the record

(NYSCEF 1284,1470, 1575)6

6. CWCapital Cobalt memorandum of law for summary judgment (NYSCEF

1300, 1471, 1575)7

7. Jonathan Pickhardt’s affirmation (NYSCEF 1285, 1472, 1575)8

8. CWCapital Cobalt reply to supplement the record (NYSCEF 1327, 1473,

1575)9

The motion is unopposed. There is no indication that the press or public have an

5 A publicly redacted copy is filed at NYSCEF 1570. 6 A publicly redacted copy is filed at NYSCEF 1575. 7 A publicly redacted copy is filed at NYSCEF 1575.

8 A publicly redacted copy is filed at NYSCEF 1575.

9 A publicly redacted copy is filed at NYSCEF 1575.

653277/2018 CWCAPITAL COBALT VR LTD. vs. CWCAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC Page 2 of 6 Motion No. 037 038

2 of 6 [* 2] INDEX NO. 653277/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1605 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/24/2024

Section 216.1(a) of the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts empowers courts to seal

documents upon a written finding of good cause. It provides:

“(a) [e]xcept where otherwise provided by statute or rule, a court shall not enter an order in any action or proceeding sealing the court records, whether in whole or in part, except upon a written finding of good cause, which shall specify the grounds thereof. In determining whether good cause has been shown, the court shall consider the interests of the public as well as the parties. Where it appears necessary or desirable, the court may prescribe appropriate notice and an opportunity to be heard.”

“Under New York law, there is a broad presumption that the public is entitled to access

to judicial proceedings and court records.” (Mosallem v Berenson, 76 AD3d 345, 348

[1st Dept 2010] [citations omitted].) The “party seeking to seal court records has the

burden to demonstrate compelling circumstances to justify restricting public access” to

the documents. (Id. at 349 [citations omitted].) Good cause must “rest on a sound

basis or legitimate need to take judicial action.” (Danco Lab, Ltd. v Chemical Works of

Gedeon Richter, Ltd., 274 AD2d 1, 8 [1st Dept 2000] [internal quotations omitted].)

Mot. Seq. No. 037

Sculptor has demonstrated good cause to redact NYSCEF 941, 1111, 942, 1110,

1117, 1222, 1230 and 1569 which contain nonparty financial information. Courts have

recognized a compelling interest in sealing a third-party’s financial or private information

as disclosure could imping upon the privacy rights of these nonparties. (See Mancheski

v Gabelli Group Capital Partners, 39 AD3d 499, 502 [2d Dept 2007]; Natixis Real Estate

Capital Tr. 2007-HE2 v Natixis Real Estate Capital, Inc., 77 Misc 3d 1224 [A] [Sup Ct,

NY County 2023].) Here, disclosure of Sculptor’s financial information would impair its

privacy rights and result in harm to its competitive advantage. Accordingly, these

documents shall be redacted.

653277/2018 CWCAPITAL COBALT VR LTD. vs. CWCAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC Page 3 of 6 Motion No. 037 038

3 of 6 [* 3] INDEX NO. 653277/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1605 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/24/2024

Mot. Seq. No. 038

PNC Bank has demonstrated good cause to seal NYSCEF 1271, 1287, 1288,

1289 and 1573 which contain nonparty price terms, financial calculations, and deal

term. Courts have recognized a compelling interest in sealing a third-party’s financial or

private information as disclosure could impinge upon the privacy rights of this nonparty.

(See Mancheski, 39 AD3d at 502 ; Natixis Real Estate Capital Tr. 2007-HE2, 77 Misc

3d 1224 [A].) Here, disclosure of PNC Bank financial information would impair its

privacy rights and result in competitive harm. Accordingly, these documents shall be

sealed.

PNC Bank seeks to seal, or in the alternative redact, NYSCEF 1284,1470, 1300,

1471, 1285, 1472, 1327, 1473 and 1575, which are memoranda of Law that cite

nonparty confidential financial information. Wholesale sealing of the entire record is

generally disfavored, even if both parties to the litigation request sealing. (See

Applehead Pictures LLC v Perelman, 80 AD3d 181, 192 [1st Dept 2010] [citation

omitted].) Besides the nonparty financial information, the memoranda of law on their

face, do not disclose any other confidential information which makes wholesale sealing

unduly broad and unfavorable. Accordingly, these documents shall be redacted rather

than sealed.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that motion sequence 037 is granted, and the County Clerk, upon

service of this order, shall seal NYSCEF 941, 1111, 942, 1110, 1117, 1222, 1230 and

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mancheski v. Gabelli Group Capital Partners
39 A.D.3d 499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Applehead Pictures LLC v. Perelman
80 A.D.3d 181 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Danco Laboratories, Ltd. v. Chemical Works of Gedeon Richter, Ltd.
274 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 34515(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cwcapital-cobalt-vr-ltd-v-cwcaptial-invs-llc-nysupctnewyork-2024.