C.W. v. State - corrected 4/12/17

District Court of Appeal of Florida

C.W. v. State - corrected 4/12/17

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 10, 2017

Docket5D17-1023

StatusPublished

This text of C.W. v. State - corrected 4/12/17 (C.W. v. State - corrected 4/12/17) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

C.W. v. State - corrected 4/12/17, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

C.W.,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D17-1023 LT No. 17-10474-CIDL CORRECTED

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 12, 2017

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Wilbur L. Cooke, II, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Diana R. Esposito, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

C.W. petitions for a writ of habeas corpus for his release from his involuntary

confinement at the Halifax Health Medical Center ("Medical Center") in Daytona Beach,

Florida. C.W. was admitted to the Medical Center for involuntary examination under the

Baker Act 1 on February 11, 2017. At a hearing held on February 17, 2017, the circuit

1 § 394.463(2)(a)3., Fla. Stat. (2016). court determined that C.W. met the criteria for involuntary commitment and issued an

order for involuntary inpatient placement at the Medical Center under section 394.467(1),

Florida Statutes (2016).

On March 28, 2017, Appellant petitioned the circuit court for a writ of habeas

corpus. 2 The circuit court held a hearing on the petition on March 30, 2017. The circuit

court heard testimony from C.W.'s doctor, Dr. Chaiffetz, that C.W. would benefit from

"extended stabilization" and that there was a risk of "decompensation" without the

structured environment of the Medical Center. Dr. Chaiffetz noted that C.W. had been

released previously only to relapse and be readmitted a short time later. The circuit court

denied the petition stating that it believed involuntary placement in the Medical Center

was "a lifeboat" for C.W. The circuit court explained that C.W. needed to "stay in this

lifeboat a little bit longer" and that the court was "trying desperately to get [C.W.] to do

that."

C.W. contends that he is entitled to immediate release because the record does

not contain clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself or others. The

State properly concedes error and agrees that the writ of habeas corpus should be

granted. Accordingly, we grant C.W.'s petition for writ of habeas corpus and order his

immediate release. See § 394.467(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016); In re Lehrke, 12 So. 3d 307,

308-09 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (citing Blue v. State, 764 So. 2d 697, 698 (Fla. 1st DCA

2000)). No motion for rehearing will be entertained.

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER, BERGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

2 The involuntary placement proceeding occurred in Case No. 2017-10248-MHDL while the habeas corpus petition was docketed as Case No. 2017-10474-CIDL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI