Cuzzacre v. Benco Togs, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cuzzacre v. Benco Togs, Inc.

9 A.D.2d 624, 193 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7043

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 29, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 624 (Cuzzacre v. Benco Togs, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuzzacre v. Benco Togs, Inc., 9 A.D.2d 624, 193 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon seven printed copies of the record before" the Appellate Term and seven typewritten copies of the additional papers required on appeal to this court and upon typewritten appellant’s points on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the combined printed and typewritten record and one copy of the typewritten appellant’s points upon the respondent and files seven copies of each thereof with this court; and further granted insofar as to dispense with printing of the exhibits on condition that the appellant files with this court five photostatic copies of each exhibit on or before the Wednesday preceding the first day of the term for which the appeal is noticed for argument. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon seven printed copies of the record before" the Appellate Term and seven typewritten copies of the additional papers required on appeal to this court and upon typewritten appellant’s points on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the combined printed and typewritten record and one copy of the typewritten appellant’s points upon the respondent and files seven copies of each thereof with this court; and further granted insofar as to dispense with printing of the exhibits on condition that the appellant files with this court five photostatic copies of each exhibit on or before the Wednesday preceding the first day of the term for which the appeal is noticed for argument. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 624, 193 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuzzacre-v-benco-togs-inc-nyappdiv-1959.