Cuyjet v. Port Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cuyjet v. Port Authority

125 A.D.2d 196, 508 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62470

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 125 A.D.2d 196 (Cuyjet v. Port Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuyjet v. Port Authority, 125 A.D.2d 196, 508 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas E. Mercure, J.), entered on July 19, 1985, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, without costs or disbursements, unless the plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $225,790.04 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[197]*197After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. We have considered the other contentions and find that they are without merit. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas E. Mercure, J.), entered on July 19, 1985, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages, without costs or disbursements, unless the plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in her favor to $225,790.04 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[197]*197After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. We have considered the other contentions and find that they are without merit. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Milonas and Rosenberger, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 A.D.2d 196, 508 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuyjet-v-port-authority-nyappdiv-1986.