Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Okocha

697 N.E.2d 223, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1486, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2461
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Okocha. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 Ohio St. 3d 3
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 30, 1998·No. 97-2648·Published

Opinion

On May 12,1998, oral argument was held in this case. On July 23,1998, respondent filed a motion for sanctions. In his motion, respondent requests that the court sanction counsel for the relator and [1487]*1487submits material relating to the merits of this case.

It is determined by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s motion constitutes further briefing in this case and relates to the merits of this case. Whereas S.Ct.Prae.R. IX(8) prohibits the filing of any additional briefs or other materials relating to the merits of the case after the case has been orally argued, unless otherwise ordered by the court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s motion for sanctions be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Okocha, 697 N.E.2d 223, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1486, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2461 (Ohio 1998).

697 N.E.2d 223 (Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Okocha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.