Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Muhlbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Muhlbach

738 N.E.2d 1250, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3118

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 29, 2000

Docket99-808

StatusPublished

This text of 738 N.E.2d 1250 (Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Muhlbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Muhlbach, 738 N.E.2d 1250, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3118 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

This matter came on for further consideration upon the filing on September 19, 2000, by respondent, P. Michael Muhlbach, of an application for reinstatement. On October 12, 2000, relator, Cuyahoga County Bar Association, filed a motion for leave to respond to application for reinstatement. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion for leave to respond be, and hereby is, granted, effective November 28, 2000.

Douglas, J., dissents and would grant the application for reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter came on for further consideration upon the filing on September 19, 2000, by respondent, P. Michael Muhlbach, of an application for reinstatement. On October 12, 2000, relator, Cuyahoga County Bar Association, filed a motion for leave to respond to application for reinstatement. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion for leave to respond be, and hereby is, granted, effective November 28, 2000.

Douglas, J., dissents and would grant the application for reinstatement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

738 N.E.2d 1250, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuyahoga-cty-bar-assn-v-muhlbach-ohio-2000.