Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kraus

Ohio Supreme Court

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kraus

2002 Ohio 6299, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1218

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 8, 2002

Docket2000-1107

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2002 Ohio 6299 (Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kraus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kraus, 2002 Ohio 6299, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1218 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 1218.]

CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION V. KRAUS. [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kraus, 2002-Ohio-6299.] (No. 2000-1107—Submitted November 6, 2002—Decided November 8, 2002.) ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION. __________________ {¶1} On October 14, 2002, respondent, David P. Kraus, filed an application for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), and with its order dated January 17, 2001, in which the court stayed respondent’s suspension and placed him on monitored probation. {¶2} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of respondent, David P. Kraus, Attorney Registration No. 0039592, last known business address in Beachwood, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated. {¶3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶4} For earlier cases, see In re Report of the Comm. on Continuing Legal Edn. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 1401, 1403, 651 N.E.2d 1303; In re Report of the Comm. on Continuing Legal Edn. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 1418, 1420, 707 N.E.2d 509; and Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kraus (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 25, 740 N.E.2d 1092. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 1218.]

CUYAHOGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION V. KRAUS. [Cite as Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kraus, 2002-Ohio-6299.] (No. 2000-1107—Submitted November 6, 2002—Decided November 8, 2002.) ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION. __________________ {¶1} On October 14, 2002, respondent, David P. Kraus, filed an application for termination of probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), and with its order dated January 17, 2001, in which the court stayed respondent’s suspension and placed him on monitored probation. {¶2} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of respondent, David P. Kraus, Attorney Registration No. 0039592, last known business address in Beachwood, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated. {¶3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶4} For earlier cases, see In re Report of the Comm. on Continuing Legal Edn. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 1401, 1403, 651 N.E.2d 1303; In re Report of the Comm. on Continuing Legal Edn. (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 1418, 1420, 707 N.E.2d 509; and Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Kraus (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 25, 740 N.E.2d 1092. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2002 Ohio 6299, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuyahoga-cty-bar-assn-v-kraus-ohio-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack