Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Boychuk
684 N.E.2d 86, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Boychuk. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 Ohio St. 3d 93 →
Opinion
On August 22, 1997, respondent filed an affidavit of compliance. Whereas the affidavit of compliance did not contain a proof of service as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s affidavit of compliance be, and hereby is, stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Boychuk, 684 N.E.2d 86, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1502 (Ohio 1997).
684 N.E.2d 86 (Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Boychuk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.