Cuyahoga County Board of Revision v. Federal Reserve Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Cuyahoga County Board of Revision v. Federal Reserve Bank

242 N.E.2d 571, 16 Ohio St. 2d 42, 45 Ohio Op. 2d 325, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 336

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 4, 1968

DocketNo. 68-285

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 N.E.2d 571 (Cuyahoga County Board of Revision v. Federal Reserve Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuyahoga County Board of Revision v. Federal Reserve Bank, 242 N.E.2d 571, 16 Ohio St. 2d 42, 45 Ohio Op. 2d 325, 1968 Ohio LEXIS 336 (Ohio 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant contends that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable and unlawful [43]*43because the board failed to consider all the evidence in determining the true value in money of the subject-property and because the board rejected all the testimony of the appellant’s expert witness.

A complete and careful examination of the entire record in this cause discloses that the finding of the Board of Tax Appeals is supported by creditable and substantial evidence and that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is not unreasonable or unlawful.

The decision of the board is, therefore, affirmed on authority of Bd. of Revision v. Fodor, 15 Ohio St. 2d 52.

Decision affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI