Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Stidham

630 N.E.2d 662, 69 Ohio St. 3d 80
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 1994·No. No. 93-2175·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years; after one year, respondent, upon application, will be reinstated and placed on probation for the second year with supervision by the Cuyahoga County Bar Association to [83] identify and prevent recurring patterns of neglect, failure to account, and failure to properly maintain and deliver clients’ funds. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Stidham, 630 N.E.2d 662, 69 Ohio St. 3d 80 (Ohio 1994).

630 N.E.2d 662 (Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Stidham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Stidham
1994 Ohio 269 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)