Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Rubino

721 N.E.2d 986, 87 Ohio St. 3d 466
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 5, 2000·No. No. 99-1560·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. An attorney is required to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation even when the subject of the investigation is himself. Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vala (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 57, 59, 693 N.E.2d 1083, 1084. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Rubino, 721 N.E.2d 986, 87 Ohio St. 3d 466 (Ohio 2000).

721 N.E.2d 986 (Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Rubino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. James
109 Ohio St. 3d 310 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. Paterson
786 N.E.2d 874 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Rubino
760 N.E.2d 818 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Rubino
2000 Ohio 480 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)