Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Petrancek

702 N.E.2d 414, 84 Ohio St. 3d 153, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3253
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 2, 1998·No. No. 98-759·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. On occasions where there has been prior discipline, disbarment is appropriate when the lawyer knowingly violates the terms of the prior disciplinary order and that violation causes actual or potential injury to a client, the public, the legal system, or the profession. We adopt the panel’s recommendation. Respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Petrancek, 702 N.E.2d 414, 84 Ohio St. 3d 153, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3253 (Ohio 1998).

702 N.E.2d 414 (Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Petrancek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Petrancek
1998 Ohio 588 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)