Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Okocha

632 N.E.2d 1284, 69 Ohio St. 3d 398
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 8, 1994·No. No. 93-2102·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings, conclusions, and recommendation. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Okocha, 632 N.E.2d 1284, 69 Ohio St. 3d 398 (Ohio 1994).

632 N.E.2d 1284 (Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Okocha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik
2000 Ohio 219 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik
732 N.E.2d 985 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Okocha
1998 Ohio 183 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)