Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Nigolian

Ohio Supreme Court

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Nigolian

718 N.E.2d 417, 87 Ohio St. 3d 147

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 27, 1999

DocketNo. 99-1162

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 718 N.E.2d 417 (Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Nigolian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Nigolian, 718 N.E.2d 417, 87 Ohio St. 3d 147 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Given respondent’s restitution, remorse, and ultimate cooperation in the proceedings, a definite suspension from the practice of law is an appropriate sanction for his misconduct. See Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Caywood (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 185, 580 N.E.2d 1076. Respondent is hereby suspended from the [150]*150practice of law in Ohio for one year, with six months stayed on the condition that during the first six months of the suspension, he take six hours of continuing legal education courses in law office management. Costs taxed to respondent.¹

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Given respondent’s restitution, remorse, and ultimate cooperation in the proceedings, a definite suspension from the practice of law is an appropriate sanction for his misconduct. See Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Caywood (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 185, 580 N.E.2d 1076. Respondent is hereby suspended from the [150]*150practice of law in Ohio for one year, with six months stayed on the condition that during the first six months of the suspension, he take six hours of continuing legal education courses in law office management. Costs taxed to respondent.¹

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

718 N.E.2d 417, 87 Ohio St. 3d 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuyahoga-county-bar-assn-v-nigolian-ohio-1999.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack