Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Garfield

112 Ohio St. 3d 1216
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 20, 2007
DocketNo. 2005-2333
StatusPublished

This text of 112 Ohio St. 3d 1216 (Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Garfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Garfield, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1216 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Robert Earl Garfield, Attorney Registration No. 0001873, last known business address in Pepper Pike, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of May 3, 2006, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of eighteen months with a starting date of March 28, 2005, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. '

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Garfield, 109 Ohio St.3d 103, 2006-Ohio-1935, 846 N.E.2d 45.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Garfield
846 N.E.2d 45 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 Ohio St. 3d 1216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuyahoga-county-bar-assn-v-garfield-ohio-2007.