Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Dyck

570 N.E.2d 1105, 59 Ohio St. 3d 68, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 943
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 1991·No. No. 90-2538·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated Gov. Bar R. V(5)(a). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Dyck, 570 N.E.2d 1105, 59 Ohio St. 3d 68, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 943 (Ohio 1991).

570 N.E.2d 1105 (Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Dyck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Akron Bar Assn. v. Pringle
1996 Ohio 220 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)