Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Boychuk
This text of 679 N.E.2d 1081 (Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Boychuk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We have said on many occasions that the misappropriation of client funds and the neglect of client interests normally warrant the severe sanction of disbarment. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Sterner (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 164, 167, 672 N.E.2d 633, 635, and cases cited therein. However, in imposing a sanction, we consider not only the duty violated, but also the lawyer’s mental state, the actual injury caused, and whether mitigating factors exist. In this case, we note respondent’s personal and emotional problems that existed at the time of these infractions and the steps respondent has since taken to recover from her involvement with alcohol and drugs. We also note that respondent began a timely, good-faith effort to make restitution before disciplinary proceedings were commenced. Therefore, we agree with the board’s recommendation and order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for two years. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
679 N.E.2d 1081, 79 Ohio St. 3d 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuyahoga-county-bar-assn-v-boychuk-ohio-1997.