Cutts Vs. Richland Holdings, Inc. (Nrap 5)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MICHAEL CUTTS, No. 79225 Appellant,
vs. FL RICHLAND HOLDINGS, INC., D/B/A ACCTCORP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA; AND CLIFFORD MOLIN, D/B/A ZEEBA FEB 2 7 :120 SLEEP CENTER, EuzArF.E.21-Difv CLERK PZWE COURT
Respondents.
BY
DEPUTY CI
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this matter is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BRO7
BY:
cc: Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit The Law Office of Vernon Nelson Marquis Aurbach Coffing Garman Turner Gordon
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
(01-1947 •4110).
zo. Dwor
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cutts Vs. Richland Holdings, Inc. (Nrap 5) (Cutts Vs. Richland Holdings, Inc. (Nrap 5)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.