Cutts v. State
This text of 641 S.W.2d 461 (Cutts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Movant-defendant had been convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison. The judgment was affirmed on appeal. See State v. Cutts, 600 S.W.2d 75 (Mo.App.1980).
By his motion and testimony movant-de-fendant made a multitude of charges of ineffective assistance of counsel. Seasoned trial counsel testified to thorough investigation and consultation with defendant. Hearing judge Anna C. Forder made detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law in 13 points, accepting the testimony of trial counsel and rejecting defendant’s.
Our thorough review of the evidence warrants affirmance of the motion court’s judgment. Rule 27.26(j). An extended opinion would have no precedential value.
Affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.-16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
641 S.W.2d 461, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutts-v-state-moctapp-1982.