Cutts v. State
This text of 112 S.E. 910 (Cutts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There is no material error in the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, when it is considered in connection with the remainder of the charge.
2. “ While the evidence is rather weak, this court cannot say as a matter of law that the verdict is without evidence to support it. The verdict having been approved by the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme .Court, a reviewing court is powerless to interfere.” Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82, 83 (105 S. E. 377), and cases cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 S.E. 910, 28 Ga. App. 678, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutts-v-state-gactapp-1922.