Cutts v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cutts v. State

112 S.E. 910, 28 Ga. App. 678, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 774

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1922·No. 13512·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no material error in the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, when it is considered in connection with the remainder of the charge.

2. “ While the evidence is rather weak, this court cannot say as a matter of law that the verdict is without evidence to support it. The verdict having been approved by the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme .Court, a reviewing court is powerless to interfere.” Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82, 83 (105 S. E. 377), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no material error in the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, when it is considered in connection with the remainder of the charge.

2. “ While the evidence is rather weak, this court cannot say as a matter of law that the verdict is without evidence to support it. The verdict having been approved by the trial judge, under the repeated and uniform rulings of this court and of the Supreme .Court, a reviewing court is powerless to interfere.” Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82, 83 (105 S. E. 377), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cutts v. State, 112 S.E. 910, 28 Ga. App. 678, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 774 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

112 S.E. 910 (Cutts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related