Cutts v. State

101 S.E. 585, 24 Ga. App. 547, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 919
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 9, 1919
Docket10951
StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 585 (Cutts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cutts v. State, 101 S.E. 585, 24 Ga. App. 547, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 919 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. When considered in the light of the entire charge and of the facts, and of the qualifying note of the trial judge to the first ground of the motion for a new trial, the motion points out no error which would require the grant of a new trial.

2. The evidence authorized the conviction, the verdict is approved by the presiding judge, no error of law is pointed out, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, p. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 S.E. 585, 24 Ga. App. 547, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutts-v-state-gactapp-1919.