Cutts v. Parsons

2 Mass. 440
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 15, 1807·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

This was an action of debt, brought upon an administration bond 'or the use and benefit of one George Lord. Since the last con [397] tinuance the plaintiff resigned his office. There being no motion to the Court for the continuance of the action, that the successor who may be hereafter appointed may come in and prosecute, the Court ordered a discontinuance to be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cutts v. Parsons, 2 Mass. 440 (Mass. 1807).

2 Mass. 440 (Cutts v. Parsons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stone v. Jenkins
57 N.E. 1002 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Stevens v. Hay
60 Mass. 229 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1850)