Cutts v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cutts v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

548 S.W.3d 451

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 29, 2018

DocketWD 80884

StatusPublished

This text of 548 S.W.3d 451 (Cutts v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cutts v. Mo. Bd. of Prob. & Parole, 548 S.W.3d 451 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*452Rodney Cutts appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment and entering judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole. He claims that he had a protected liberty interest in parole once he served the mandatory minimum sentence. He further contends that he was denied meaningful parole consideration when the Board did not disclose to him, and based its decision on, inaccurate adverse information in his parole file. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*452Rodney Cutts appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment and entering judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole. He claims that he had a protected liberty interest in parole once he served the mandatory minimum sentence. He further contends that he was denied meaningful parole consideration when the Board did not disclose to him, and based its decision on, inaccurate adverse information in his parole file. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

548 S.W.3d 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutts-v-mo-bd-of-prob-parole-moctapp-2018.