Cutts v. Ford

139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 108, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 499
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 14, 1927
Docket18148
StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 134 (Cutts v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cutts v. Ford, 139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 108, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 499 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the facts of the case as disclosed by the record, the overruling of the certiorari was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

LuJce and Bloodworlh, JJ., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 134, 37 Ga. App. 108, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutts-v-ford-gactapp-1927.