Cuttino v. Mimms

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cuttino v. Mimms

72 S.E.2d 707, 209 Ga. 360, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 492

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 14, 1952

DocketNo. 17957

StatusPublished

This text of 72 S.E.2d 707 (Cuttino v. Mimms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuttino v. Mimms, 72 S.E.2d 707, 209 Ga. 360, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 492 (Ga. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Wyatt, Justice.

The pleadings in this case are identical with those in Woolsey v. Mimms, ante, and involve the same subject matter and the same parties. The ruling in Woolsey v. Mimms, ante, is therefore controlling in the instant case. It follows that the Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction of this case.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur,' except Candler, /., disqualified. McCurdy & Candler and J. Robin Harris, for plaintiff in error. McKenzie & Kaler and Sam P. McKenzie, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyatt, Justice.

The pleadings in this case are identical with those in Woolsey v. Mimms, ante, and involve the same subject matter and the same parties. The ruling in Woolsey v. Mimms, ante, is therefore controlling in the instant case. It follows that the Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction of this case.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur,' except Candler, /., disqualified. McCurdy & Candler and J. Robin Harris, for plaintiff in error. McKenzie & Kaler and Sam P. McKenzie, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 S.E.2d 707, 209 Ga. 360, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuttino-v-mimms-ga-1952.