Cuttino v. Mimms

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cuttino v. Mimms

72 S.E.2d 707, 209 Ga. 360, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 492

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 14, 1952·No. No. 17957·Published

Opinion

Wyatt, Justice.

The pleadings in this case are identical with those in Woolsey v. Mimms, ante, and involve the same subject matter and the same parties. The ruling in Woolsey v. Mimms, ante, is therefore controlling in the instant case. It follows that the Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction of this case.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur,' except Candler, /., disqualified. McCurdy & Candler and J. Robin Harris, for plaintiff in error. McKenzie & Kaler and Sam P. McKenzie, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyatt, Justice.

The pleadings in this case are identical with those in Woolsey v. Mimms, ante, and involve the same subject matter and the same parties. The ruling in Woolsey v. Mimms, ante, is therefore controlling in the instant case. It follows that the Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction of this case.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur,' except Candler, /., disqualified. McCurdy & Candler and J. Robin Harris, for plaintiff in error. McKenzie & Kaler and Sam P. McKenzie, contra.

Cuttino v. Mimms, 72 S.E.2d 707, 209 Ga. 360, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 492 (Ga. 1952).

Pincite

72 S.E.2d 707 (Cuttino v. Mimms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.