Cutting v. Tappan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Cutting v. Tappan

59 N.H. 562

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 N.H. 562 (Cutting v. Tappan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cutting v. Tappan, 59 N.H. 562 (N.H. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The question is, whether the horse at the time of its attachment was required for the plaintiff’s actual use. G. L., c. 224, s. 2, § 12. On this question of fact there is evidence to be considered by the referee. Somers v. Emerson, 58 N. H. 48; Rice v. Wadsworth, ante 100; George v. Fellows, ante 206.

Report recommitted.

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

The question is, whether the horse at the time of its attachment was required for the plaintiff’s actual use. G. L., c. 224, s. 2, § 12. On this question of fact there is evidence to be considered by the referee. Somers v. Emerson, 58 N. H. 48; Rice v. Wadsworth, ante 100; George v. Fellows, ante 206.

Report recommitted.

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 N.H. 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutting-v-tappan-nh-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack