Cutting v. Carter

Virginia Chancery Court

Cutting v. Carter

4 Va. 478

DecidedFebruary 15, 1810

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Va. 478 (Cutting v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Virginia Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cutting v. Carter, 4 Va. 478 (Va. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Chancellor.

An order for an account is not to be made as of course, and should not be directed, but upon a hearing, unless the parties consent. The application was therefore premature; but where it would be proper, as for instance, in all cases where the cause is ready for a decision, which cannot be had without an account, it should not be directed in vacation, without notice to the adverse party or his counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Chancellor.

An order for an account is not to be made as of course, and should not be directed, but upon a hearing, unless the parties consent. The application was therefore premature; but where it would be proper, as for instance, in all cases where the cause is ready for a decision, which cannot be had without an account, it should not be directed in vacation, without notice to the adverse party or his counsel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Va. 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutting-v-carter-vachanct-1810.