Cutter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cutter v. State

310 S.E.2d 747, 168 Ga. App. 639, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2875

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 26, 1983

Docket67163

StatusPublished

This text of 310 S.E.2d 747 (Cutter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cutter v. State, 310 S.E.2d 747, 168 Ga. App. 639, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2875 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

On appeal from defendant’s conviction of armed robbery, his appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and supporting brief pursuant to Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976). After considering the points raised in the brief and conducting a thorough examination of the record and transcript to determine independently whether there is any ground for reversal, we are in agreement with counsel that there is no arguable merit to the appeal. Therefore, this court grants the motion to withdraw and affirms the conviction. We are satisfied that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. See generally Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89 (1) (263 SE2d 131) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Judge.

On appeal from defendant’s conviction of armed robbery, his appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and supporting brief pursuant to Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976). After considering the points raised in the brief and conducting a thorough examination of the record and transcript to determine independently whether there is any ground for reversal, we are in agreement with counsel that there is no arguable merit to the appeal. Therefore, this court grants the motion to withdraw and affirms the conviction. We are satisfied that the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. See generally Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89 (1) (263 SE2d 131) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

310 S.E.2d 747, 168 Ga. App. 639, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutter-v-state-gactapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack