Cutter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cutter v. State

386 So. 2d 866, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17332

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 14, 1980

DocketNo. SS-103

StatusPublished

This text of 386 So. 2d 866 (Cutter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cutter v. State, 386 So. 2d 866, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17332 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing. Although appellant based his motion on several grounds, the only ground which might entitle him to the relief sought would be his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court’s order denying the ineffective assistance of counsel claim asserted that the record refuted appellant’s allegations, but no portion of the record or file was attached to the order.

We reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to either attach that portion of the record which was found to refute appellant’s allegation or to conduct an evidentiary hearing. Calhoun v. State, 362 So.2d 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

MILLS, C. J., and McCORD and WENT-WORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing. Although appellant based his motion on several grounds, the only ground which might entitle him to the relief sought would be his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court’s order denying the ineffective assistance of counsel claim asserted that the record refuted appellant’s allegations, but no portion of the record or file was attached to the order.

We reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to either attach that portion of the record which was found to refute appellant’s allegation or to conduct an evidentiary hearing. Calhoun v. State, 362 So.2d 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).

MILLS, C. J., and McCORD and WENT-WORTH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

386 So. 2d 866, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutter-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack