Cutter v. Gudebrod Bros.
This text of 112 A.D. 894 (Cutter v. Gudebrod Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment entered on the report of the referee affirmed, with costs. Appeal from judgment of April‘8,1899, dismissed. No opinion.. Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks and Rich, JJ., concurred; Miller, J., voted to modify the judgment entered on the report of the referee by deducting the allowance for interest on the plaintiff’s claim, and also the eleven and seventy-seven one-hundredths per cent of the selling price for the expense of sale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A.D. 894, 97 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cutter-v-gudebrod-bros-nyappdiv-1906.