Cutrer v. Mid-Continent Group

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Cutrer v. Mid-Continent Group

747 So. 2d 23, 1999 La. LEXIS 1991, 1999 WL 512168

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 2, 1999·No. No. 99-C-1402·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

IN RE: Mid-Continent Group; Benson Chevrolet Co. Inc.; Gonzales, David; — De[24] fendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Tangipahoa 21st Judicial 'District Court Div. “C” Number 96-02626; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number CA98 0315

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel. VICTORY, J. would grant the writ. LEMMON, J. concurs. The law of the case doctrine does not apply to writ denials.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN RE: Mid-Continent Group; Benson Chevrolet Co. Inc.; Gonzales, David; — De[24] fendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; Parish of Tangipahoa 21st Judicial 'District Court Div. “C” Number 96-02626; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number CA98 0315

Denied.

CALOGERO, C.J. not on panel. VICTORY, J. would grant the writ. LEMMON, J. concurs. The law of the case doctrine does not apply to writ denials.

Cutrer v. Mid-Continent Group, 747 So. 2d 23, 1999 La. LEXIS 1991, 1999 WL 512168 (La. 1999).

Pincite

747 So. 2d 23 (Cutrer v. Mid-Continent Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related